lung removed? Changing 100% of a system for around 10 - 15% is stupid but so would be healthy people cutting out their lungs. Quirk, save the apple/orange arguments.
Law & Ethics - 4 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
That's not "liberal logic." That's came from your own mind. You see, no matter how partisan a person may be, such a proposition would be utter nonsense. Hopefully, you realize that.
2 :
On the tragic day of 9/11, only 0.00001% of the US population was killed in the attacks. So by your percentage-centric Conservative logic, we shouldn't have lifted a finger over that issue.
3 :
No one gets the lung removed. It's about equality. Everyone equally miserable.
4 :
From your logic I take it you are not immunised?
Read more discussions :
- Are we sure that lung cancer is from cigarette smo...
- In a British study around 1950, a group of 649 men...
- What are different types of conventional treatment...
- What are some types of experimental treatment for ...
- Do any of you know personally a person who has die...
- whats the chances of surviving lung cancer
- What are the warning signs of lung cancer and what...
- How did you get well from lung cancer without chem...
