Wednesday, July 28, 2010

Is it possible to cure a tumor lung cancer without surgery or chemo

Is it possible to cure a tumor lung cancer without surgery or chemo??
She is 74 and surgery is not the best option.
Cancer - 6 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
miracle, or some herbal cure
2 :
Afraid not. Most cancers of the lung are aggressive and need surgery and chemo. Find a teaching hospital in your area for treatment advice and check the NIH web site for experimental treatments she could enter. Her oncologist (cancer doctor) should already be doing this
3 :
Black Walnut Hull Tincture get it asap from a health food store. Then cottage cheese and Flax seed oil every morning Finally apricot seeds or Vitamin B17 from health food stores. No Soda keep the ph alkaline and low carbohydrate foods Mostly fruits and veggi.
4 :
no...you need one or the other...i'm sorry but you'll have to choose one of those options.
5 :
There is no cure for cancer .. but there may be treatment available . . it really depends on the size of the tumor and her overall health, but another option might be minimally invasive Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) . . . however the tumor must be a certain size and shape and not everyone is a candidate: http://www.radiologyinfo.org/en/info.cfm?pg=rfalung&bhcp=1 http://www.rfalung.com/
6 :
I don't think so. There are some complementary treatments she could take to make her feel better. But the only sure way to try to control the tumor is with surgery, chemotherapy or radiotherapy.




Read more discussions :

Saturday, July 24, 2010

I really like the taste of smoked salmon, but im afraid its going to give me lung cancer

I really like the taste of smoked salmon, but im afraid its going to give me lung cancer?
dont get me wrong, its delicious, but smoking is a bad habit, so is it possible for me to retract lung cancer from fish that have been smoking to create that delicious smoked flavour
Other - Food & Drink - 3 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
MMMMM. but i agree. fish should stop smoking. Don't they know the risks! Well they should.... because they are all dead and you are eating them.
2 :
you have to physically inhale the smoke to get lung cancer, smoked means they cook the fish with hot smoke.
3 :
Look for salmon that smoke low tar cigarettes.




Read more discussions :

Tuesday, July 20, 2010

which of the following shows the greatest promise as a lung cancer chemotherapy agent

which of the following shows the greatest promise as a lung cancer chemotherapy agent?
A drug that.... A. Causes cells to divide at a right angle from their usual orientation. B. interferes with cellular meiosis. C. Prevents sister chromatids from sepratingat anaphase. D. Prevents tetrad formation. E. Prevents crossing over.
Cancer - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
E. Prevents crossing over.




Read more discussions :

Friday, July 16, 2010

Do you believe cigarette companies are to blame for most lung cancer deaths

Do you believe cigarette companies are to blame for most lung cancer deaths?
Or is the smoker and those who turned them onto smoking the ones who should be considered responsible? I wanted to ask this because I was thinking of a case where there's a kid and you as an adult turn them onto smoking because it's the cool, or "in" thing to be doing and they drop dead from lung cancer, technically they are responsible for all the subsequent times they lit up, but you were the one that opened that initial door to doom... So does your belief on that change when it's on an individual basis or not?
Law & Ethics - 14 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
The person that lights the cigarette and puts it in their mouth are to blame..........
2 :
The government for pushing it upon the public when they knew it was a drug. And you can add crack/cocaine to that list too, which was flooded into the projects by the same government to fund the Contras.
3 :
Everyone now a days knows that Cigarettes cause cancer. They chose to pick up and try it knowing that it is bad for you. So why should they be blamed for someone elses stupidity. Same reason with Alcohol. Should the Buds and Miller Beers be responsible for all the liver diseases caused by alcoholism or for the drunk driving? No, its those people that chose to do that knowing the consequences. That is silly to think that cigarette companies should be punished for someone elses decision.
4 :
I don't know. What about people who've never smoked who get lung cancer? I would guess that most cases lung cancer are caused by cigarettes, but not all.
5 :
In the end, we are all ultimatly responsible for our actions.
6 :
I think you should have personal responsibility. I loved cigarettes but I quit cold turkey because of the heath risks. Every pack of cigarettes that you buy has a health warning. My drivers used to bring me cigarettes from the Dominican Republic and those cigarettes had warning labels. So there is no way that you can smoke or start smoking cigs nowadays and not know the health potential.
7 :
YES you could blame the smoker for starting however it is addictive and very hard to stop therefore if it weren' avaible no one would start-----just like drugs--also the majority of ppl who start are young ppl who think it's cool
8 :
Yes and no. Anyone still smoking today pretty much has had ample opportunity to stop smoking. There is no excuse for not knowing the dangers, and assuming some personal responsibility for your choices. I think the legal term is "ASSUMPTION OF RISK". However, do you hold a company responsible for producing a known dangerous product. The government has forced recalls on meat, cars, tires, ladders,,,, you name it. In some instances, they have almost shut down entire industries, such as the asbestos industry. Trouble is, they will not shut down tobacco companies because of the tax revenue.
9 :
No, and I don't believe the government should profit from the crazy tax they impose on smokers.
10 :
The smoker of the cigarettes is to blame -- as everyone said, we all know the dangers of cigarette smoking these days. There are even warning labels on the packages themselves. And the cigarette companies acknowledge the fact that they are dangerous. Like they say with guns, it isn't the gun that kills people, it's people that kill people. Everyone knows that guns are dangerous and that people die when they are shot by a gun. Does this mean that the gun manufacturers are responsible? No.
11 :
One of the responsibilities of government is to maintain the safety and well being of the citizens which it governs. It is proven that cigarettes cause lung cancer yet it still remains perfectly legal to buy as long as you are old enough. Since it is still legal it is ultimately up to the consumer to make the right choices. I know it is difficult to stop but it puzzles me to still see young kids picking up the habit. I thought it wasn't cool to smoke anymore. There is certainly enough information out there to make an informed decision. Saying "I didn't know" won't cut it anymore.
12 :
The company manufactures a legal product how is it their fault that someone chooses to light it up and breathe the toxic fumes? I think those who choose to smoke are responsible for their health problems. I also think they are responsible for their children's health problems if the smoke around them. Smoking is a choice. People choose to smoke or they don't now after they start it's awful hard to stop because it becomes an addiction but consider people like my mother in law who is completely healthy even though she has been smoking for the better part of 50 years.
13 :
The smoker is the one to blame. There is no one over 5 who can say they didnt know they were bad for you anymore.
14 :
cigarettes are definitely responsible but the companies suppling them are simply filling the need of the customer. Lung cancer is very dangerous and early detection is key. The earlier it is found the better your survival rates are, that is proven. If you smoke you should familiarize your self with the symptoms of lung cancer and if they apply to you then a check up with a doctor would follow. Below is a site that will provide you with the symptoms of lung cancer along with additional information.





Read more discussions :

Monday, July 12, 2010

what are the signs of lung cancer

what are the signs of lung cancer?
I have been smoking for a few months now not everyday though but my ribs hurt and back hurt,and i start wheezing i don't have Asama. and my friends grandma has lung cancer and her ribs and back hurt all the time..so now im freaking out i know i shouldn't smoke its a bad decision for a fourteen year old..but im freaking out.so can some one help me please lol
Cancer - 6 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
May Be This Book Can Help You, I thing... you go to my site.... http://cancertruth2010.blogspot.com.. you can buy it book...
2 :
its most likely not cancer but it may be;growing pains stop smoking and see what will happen, only for about 1 week
3 :
Well first off, lung cancer is extremely rare is people under 40. And almost unheard of in people in under 20. Most people who get lung cancer have smoked for many years. But stop now, because its very hard to quit. And even if you dont get sick from it, you will age poorly. Its espeically true for women. Even by their mid 30s you can always tell when a women has smoked for years.
4 :
well continuous cough like whooping cough symptoms are the signs of lung cancer better you buy electronic cigarette so that you'll feel the feeling of cigarette but its not dangerous
5 :
Stop smoking and see if the pains go away? I don't think it will be lung cancer but if you continue to smoke it could turn into lung cancer - 6 years ago my dad had lung cancer and the only symptom he had was a cough, he got a lung removed and survived for 3 years before he developed bowel cancer and died 6 weeks later. I am a smoker.
6 :
Hello Emily: Ok the signs to watch for is coughing up blood. but most of us find out we have lung cancer from a X-ray. But at 14 you should quit smoking it does not make you look smart and it is not cool. Have you ever looked at the face and hands of a woman who smoked for years. there mouth is wrinkled and discolored. there hands are also dark at the finger tips and they smell bad from the smoke. Is that what you really want.? But Pluses will also cause the problems you were talking about. Quit for a while if it still hurts go see the doctor.



Read more discussions :

Thursday, July 8, 2010

What is that stuff they use to use in walls? it is in old buildings, and causes lung cancer

What is that stuff they use to use in walls? it is in old buildings, and causes lung cancer?
i cant think of the name of it...its bothering me!
Cancer - 7 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Asbestos
2 :
Asbestos
3 :
Asbestos.
4 :
Asbestos.
5 :
it's asbestos and it can cause mesothelioma 4-25 yrs or more after exposure.
6 :
Two things actually. 'Asbestos', and 'Pearlite' , ( two different crystal forms of the same mineral).
7 :
Asbestos- which can cause mesothelioma




Read more discussions :

Sunday, July 4, 2010

If small cell lung cancer has spread to the brain, is the prognosis dim

If small cell lung cancer has spread to the brain, is the prognosis dim?
Stage 4 small cell has just been diagnosed and was found on the brain at diagnosis. Is it pretty much a time to make someone comfortable and prepared? Or does chemo and radiation sometimes work even if it is in stage 4 or is that just a futile effort to preserve life?
Cancer - 3 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
To my knowledge, any lung cancer that has metastasized to other organs is extremely dangerous. I would agree that you should prepare yourself, at least mentally, for the possibility of a poor outcome. I am not a doctor. Just speaking from experience with a family member. You should have this discussion with your family physician. You can only make these decisions with full disclosure about the condition of the patient.
2 :
There are no definate answers to questions like thee - each case is different. However in most cancers, if the disease has spread elsewhere then it usually lowers the prognosis (excluding localised lymph node spread). Generally spread to the brain from the lung is not a good sign but chemo or radiation may well ease symptoms and extend life expectancy. These things can be very difficult and often doctors will not give definitive answers because they just don't know.
3 :
Stage 4 lung cancer is not curable and every doctor knows this. Treatment at this point is to prolong life and decrease symptoms.




Read more discussions :

Thursday, July 1, 2010

Why did lung cancer rates not increase until 1950's if the

Why did lung cancer rates not increase until 1950's if the?
Inthe early 1920s, shortly after world war 1, smoking became fashionable for men. Why didnt lung cancer start increasing untill 1950?
Cancer - 3 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Smoking wasn't recognized by the health industry as a key cause of death....science and more studies had to come along for that to be proven. Also, the money made by the cigarettes companies, and those businesses and political high rollers they sponsored, were good at covering up the facts for an even longer time...there is a lot that was/is known, but is not shared, or is rather ignored by many in the world...simply because it brings in too much of a profit to risk the truth being public.
2 :
Dunno,........ I remember I saw something about that a long time ago.... I think they said it had something to do with pesticides, and that they couldn't find a direct link to lung cancer and smoking.
3 :
How many yrs do you have to smoke till you get lung cancer? I've been smoking for 25 yrs and so far so good. It probably takes 30 - 50 yrs to get it. Also, the first person to respond to your Q nailed it with the lack of research, etc.




Read more discussions :