Thursday, August 28, 2008

How great is my chance of getting lung cancer

How great is my chance of getting lung cancer?
I have been smoking for 16 yrs., since I was about 19. I smoked about 1/2 a pack a day for most of that time, though in the last 7 months I have been smoking about a pack a day.
Cancer - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
sheesh..ummm u really need to stop....NOW lol in a scale to 1-10 in lung cancer...ur on about 7
2 :
I don't know about your chances. So people can smoke a pack a day for 30 years and not get lung cancer. All I can tell you is that 90% of lung cancer sufferers are smokers. So think about that. You should stop.



Read more discussions :

Sunday, August 24, 2008

how long do u have to smoke black and milds to get lung cancer

how long do u have to smoke black and milds to get lung cancer?
im 16 and i smoke black and milds i only need to no how long does it take to get lung cancer and also i smoke phillie blunts and cigs.. ps.holla if u no da answa my yahoo email iz moneyxxxmaker@yahoo.com
Other - Health - 3 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Unfortunately, nobody is going to be able to accurately answer that question for you; because it isn't known. There is no 'standard' for "If I smoke x amount of cigars/cigarettes/marijuana/whatever" per day...then it will be x amount of time until I get lung cancer". For some people, it has not been very long. Others, it was for a very long time. It depends on a lot of factors. But if you care enough to consider how long you could smoke them before getting lung cancer...do you really think that you would accurately find a time to quit "just in time"? Damage is done after you smoke for a while...that's not reversible, and makes your general cancer risk much higher than normal. If you want a real way to avoid cancer, stay in shape, take care of your body, and don't smoke anything - your lungs are meant to breathe air, not smoke. Oh yeah, and your body is still growing...so you risk hindering your body, as well.
2 :
everybody is different. You can get cancer smoking for 5 years while some people never get cancer smoking all their life
3 :
as long as it takes someone to become a drug addict doing drugs or drinking to become an alcoholic. not everyone who smokes gets lung cancer, not everyone who does drugs becomes an addict and not everyone who drinks becomes an alcholic. NOW THAT I'VE SAID THAT... Nobody can tell you who will or won't have health related problems with any of those things including smoking. Everyone is different but the likely hood of having some health related problem with all of these things is probably a good bet.




Read more discussions :

Wednesday, August 20, 2008

Consequnce of missing a radiation treatment , for a lung cancer patient

Consequnce of missing a radiation treatment , for a lung cancer patient ?
My Aunt ( in another state ) , was "too tired" to go get her radiation treatment , of which she gets five per week . Is this going to offset her whole treatment ? She is also on chemo pills -with a slow growing cancer that is in both lungs and lymph nodes .
Cancer - 7 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
if she skips it, she will have big head :)
2 :
depends how many times she had missed the treatment but the medical staff knows best..but it is usually advisable to both get the radiotherapy and chemotheray altogether.
3 :
she won't have to redo the whole thing. but i think they'll prescribe something to rebalance it.
4 :
see most of the cancers of the lungs grow slowly over time...which means that the time of their diagnosis and appropriate treatment makes good sense.. In your aunt case, if the doctors have put her on both anti-cancer drugs as well as radiotherapy together, then it must have been for some specific purpose...I explain you .. Well the cancer cells though very similar to our own normal cells, exibits some peculiar metabolism rate which makes them very vulnerable to drugs against them. Also due to the same reason, the radiations used in radiotherapy specifically kills these cells..However in some cancers both can be used together and show phenominal advantage. You must understand that radiation can also kill cancer cells more easily if they are already been sensitised by prior drug therapy.. hence the answer to UR question is YES, your aunt must take both if she has been advised. In case she doesnot take, then she fails to get rid of all the cancer cells...COZ not all the cells can be killed by anti-cancer drugs alone.. So please help her in taking both on time...and hope that she get well.
5 :
She should stop the radiation. It is harmful and toxic to the body. We have reversed 54 forms of cancer with nutrition let me know if i can show you how to fight the cancer naturally.
6 :
Doctors are using both chemo and radiation to try to give your Aunt the best chance. She needs to have some one take her to her treatments, then she doesn't have to try to get herself up and going. She also needs to let her doctor know how tired she is getting. He should run a new blood test, to see if he needs to be giving her something for her blood count. Good luck and all the best to your Aunt.
7 :
Having been through the entire process myself - I recall I missed out on my radiation for almost a week as the only linear accelarater machine at the hospital broke down. I restarted my radiation and chemo at another hospital, not knowing when the machine would be repaired and the radiation could not wait. Missing out a week was ok - but I really do not imagine any doctor would even suggest that. In fact most oncologists clearly state the details of continuity for the radiation and the chemo as at the end of the ordeal - thats what is going to determine the success or failure. If your Aunts cancer has been detected in its early stages, it will more then likely be cured without too many problems. I wish her well. Caprichoso. PS - mI am not a doctor




Read more discussions :

Saturday, August 16, 2008

What are the chances of getting lung cancer from smoking

What are the chances of getting lung cancer from smoking?
Are the chances higher if you have asma? P.S. I dont smoke, i'm just really curious.
Cancer - 5 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
sadly yes the chances are a higher if you have asma but the best way to develop it is smoking
2 :
well smoking is the number one way to get lung cancer . (:
3 :
really high! almost everyone does!! when u got asthma its WAYYYYYYYYYYY higher!!
4 :
I just looked up this information for a presentation to the classes I teach. Male smokers - lifetime risk of lung cancer is 1 in 6 Female smokers – the risk is 1 in 9 Either sex Non-smokers – only 1 in 77 chance of lung cancer Cigarette smoke contains over 60 known carcinogens. The risk increases with amount of exposure – number of cigarettes per day and years of smoking [“pack years”] There is NO reason that asthma should make someone more likely to develop lung cancer - - at least I've seen no such data in the 20 years that I was a cancer specialist MD. Men who smoke are about 23 times more likely to develop cancer than non-smokers. Women who smoke - - 13 times more likely. Smoking causes about 90% of lung cancer deaths in men and almost 80% in women. In 2003, an estimated 171,900 new cases of lung cancer occurred and approximately 157,200 people died from lung cancer. Smoking causes cancers of the oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, esophagus, and bladder – as well as causing Lung Cancer
5 :
It increases the chance by about 10-20 times of normal people. Asthma does not increase the risk



Read more discussions :

Tuesday, August 12, 2008

What stage of lung cancer are you on when you start seeing these symptoms

What stage of lung cancer are you on when you start seeing these symptoms?
-Coughing -Wheezing -Feeling short of breath -Having blood in any mucus that you cough up
Respiratory Diseases - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
1 stage. However the blood mucus stays until the last stage so there is no way of telling for sure



Read more discussions :

Friday, August 8, 2008

What percentage of people die from lung cancer that are diagnosed with it

What percentage of people die from lung cancer that are diagnosed with it?
and is it higher risk the older you are?
Cancer - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
60% of people diagnosed with either type of lung cancer (non-small cell or small cell) are dead in 1 year. 73% are dead by 2 years. 1 in 7 people diagnosed with lung cancer survive 5 years (~15%) So, your answer is that roughly 85% of people with lung cancer die from it within 5 years Most of those who are cured are cured with initial surgery - - not with chemotherapy. More people die from lung cancer than any other type of cancer. In 2004 - lung cancer killed more people than breast cancer, prostate cancer, and colon cancer combined. Lung cancer accounts for 31% of all deaths from cancer. 90% of these could have been prevented if people had not smoked cigarettes. Tobacco addiction is by far the most important risk factor in the development of lung cancer. There are approximately 123,386 lung cancer deaths per year attributable to smoking.  Source:  CDC - Center for Disease Control - Atlanta Lung cancer mainly occurs in the elderly. About 2/3 of people are older than 65. Fewer than 3% are under the age of 45. Average age of diagnosis ~ 70. I would estimate that the average person I saw with lung cancer had smoked ~ 500,000 cigarettes, but that varies greatly. Some less - some more. John Wayne probably smoked more than one million cigarettes before he developed lung cancer.



Read more discussions :

Monday, August 4, 2008

how does a lung cancer metastatic to brain patient feels

how does a lung cancer metastatic to brain patient feels?
my mom has it and the cancer cells have got to her brain and it has been two weeks now that she hasn't been able to talk or function anything!! i like to know how she's feeling, she stares at the wall and doesn't respond, very sad!! please if anyone with expertise knows how the are feeling inside, i like to know?
Cancer - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
lung cancer cells are carried to brain by blood strearms and gets established as metastatic one, starts to in crease in size . it all depends on the area the location , either in cortex(periphery) of the brain or in the depth of medulla of the brain. the cortex metastasis usually make more sign and symptom with head ach and other signs like vomiting and depending up on the area of location it will act like a space occupying one. with pupillar findings since they are, helpless in expressing their feeling--nobody can under stand what is going on in them




Read more discussions :

Friday, August 1, 2008

Exactly how does Cigarette smoke cause lung cancer

Exactly how does Cigarette smoke cause lung cancer?
I know it does something to the cilia. But then, how come there have been people who have smoked their whole life and dont get cancer?
Medicine - 4 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
the process for cancer relies on the fact that cigarette smoke contains many agents that cause chronic lesion to the cells lining the respiratory tract. the constant injury requires these cells mutate at first into mature cells (metaplasia) but as the process continues they will mutate repeatedly into displasias and neoplasias (immature, pleomorfic atypical cancer cells). the mutation itself requires much nuclear activity, of course. this guides into the activation of protooncogenes (cancer related genes that reside inactive). if you lack certain protooncogenes you've very little risk of developing lung cancer. that's a brief way of putting it. now, cigarette smoke isn't only a risk factor for lung cancer so you might feel safe thinking you don't have the genes but you could develop many other types of cancer. also, cancer is only one of the dozens of complications of cigarette. this is where the cilia really take place: COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). when you smoke you paralize these cilia, which are meant to sweep particles outward. it's a protective mechanism. otherwise you will produce more mucus and develop bronchiectasias, bronchitis, etc. cigarette smoke also induces activation of alfa-1-antitrypsine which is an elastase- it tears appart the fibers that guarantee alveolar elasticity. you'll develop emphysema this way.
2 :
If you kept yourself and your car running in an air-tight garage, you would be killed eventually. The smoke from cigarette is similar to the smoke from your car, but it doesn't kill you right away. Medically, the cigarette smoke is a slow death, no matter the name is Lung Cancer or any other name. Economically, it's a waste of money (product costs, taxes, medical costs, loss of taxes you have paid for your retirement, etc.) Socially, it is a skunk in your mouth.
3 :
Cigarette smoke contains many things besides nicotine (the addictive substance which gets a really bad rap...). Nicotine affects the nervous system by binding to receptors on nerves called nicotinic receptors. The result is stimulatory and becomes addictive like other drugs like opiates (heroin, morphine etc.) and alcohol (which produces opiate like substances upon ingestion in many people and especially alcoholics) Upon burning, tobacco and tobacco paper give off many toxins, some of which are carcinogenic (cancer causing). In the not so distant past, and even today, additives such as ammonia and other chemicals are added to cigarettes for various purposes. Tar is a major offender and reeks havoc in the respiratory system (you can take it from me... my cadaver in medical school was Rod Serling). The mechanisms that cause cancer are largely unknown, but are a combination of heredity (genetics), environmental exposure, and lifestyle. Cancer is not one disease but a host of diseases which share as a common factor the abnormal growth of cells and disruption of normal cellular processes. By far and away, the chief cause of lung cancer is smoking (especially in post-menopausal women). People that smoke their whole life may not get cancer because of a genetic predisposition or protective factor that we have yet to discover, however we do know that the drawbacks of smoking are numerous both on health, life events, behavior, and life events. Jeez. Who wants yellow teeth, coughing, weight loss, circulatory effects, shortened life span and the whole laundry list of maladies suffered by smokers? Not me. It's not very attractive to boot.
4 :
The answer I just read, the detailed one is perfect. What amazes me is that there is *ARSNIC* in cigarettes and people do it anyway? I would think that alone would be enough to cause cancer since it is a poison. Don't believe me? Research.



Read more discussions :